skeletal and dentoalveolar features in patients with deep overbite malocclusion.
Authors
abstract
an increased overbite may be due to a skeletal or dental etiology that may influence treatment. the purpose of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar features in patients with deep bite malocclusion in an iranian population and to determine the most and least effective and contributory variables causing deep bite.lateral cephalograms and study casts of normal (n=85) and deep bite (n=85) subjects were used to evaluate skeletal and dentoalveolar variables. data were analyzed statistically by independent t-test. the percentages of each variable within normal limits, less and more than one standard deviation were calculated for deep bite subjects.the most significant skeletal contributing factors were gonial and basal angles, as well as the posterior facial height, ramus length, lower anterior facial height and upper anterior facial height. an increased curve of spee and decreased mandibular first molar height were predominant dental variables in the deep bite group. the variables with the greatest variances from the normal limit were the ratio of the lower anterior facial height to the total anterior facial height, the lower anterior facial height to the upper anterior facial height and the ramus length.the counterclockwise rotation of the mandible and the increased curve of spee were the dominant feature of deep bite malocclusion.
similar resources
Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Features in Patients with Deep Overbite Malocclusion
OBJECTIVE An increased overbite may be due to a skeletal or dental etiology that may influence treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar features in patients with deep bite malocclusion in an Iranian population and to determine the most and least effective and contributory variables causing deep bite. MATERIALS AND METHODS Lateral cephalograms and stu...
full textClass II malocclusion with deep overbite: A sequential approach
Objective: The aim of this case report was to evaluate the results of deep overbite correction by the segmented arch technique. Methods: The first stage of the treatment was performed with this technique to intrude incisors and canines. A maxillary transpalatal bar and a mandibular lingual arch using 0.051-in archwire were employed associated to a facial bow, anchored primarily with occipital p...
full textCategory 4: Class II Division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite.
This case report was part of the resident display of cases sponsored by the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics at the annual session of the American Association of Orthodontists, May 20-24, 2005, in San Francisco, Calif.
full textAngle Class II, Division 2, malocclusion with deep overbite
This case report describes the orthodontic treatment of an adult patient, who presented a Angle Class II, Division 2, malocclusion, with overbite, severe curve of Spee, right maxillary lateral incisor proclined and gengival recessions. The patient was treated with extraction of the first premolars and maximum anchorage control. This case was presented to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and ...
full textPrevalence and type of dental abnormalities among patients with different skeletal malocclusion classes in northern Iran
Background: Dental abnormalities are considered important, since they cause aesthetic and functional problems for people. Orthodontic treatment becomes more complicated when craniofacial abnormalities are accompanied with dental abnormalities. Objective: This study aims to compare the frequency and type of dental abnormalities among patients with different skeletal malocclusion classes in nor...
full textSkeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects
BACKGROUND The purpose of this retrospective study is to investigate the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects of two distalizing protocols featuring different anchorage systems used in patients with class II malocclusion: the MGBM system (skeletal anchorage) and Pendulum (intraoral anchorage). METHODS The sample comprised 57 patients who were assigned to one of the two treatments: the MGBM grou...
full textMy Resources
Save resource for easier access later
Journal title:
journal of dentistry, tehran university of medical sciencesجلد ۱۱، شماره ۶، صفحات ۶۲۹-۳۸
Keywords
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023